On March 6, 2017 6:55:10 PM GMT+01:00, Alexander Monakov
wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
>> >
>> >Generating SPIR-V output would not cause that output to become GPLv3
>> >licensed. However, linking the result against the GCC s
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, Richard Biener wrote:
> >I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.
> >
> >Generating SPIR-V output would not cause that output to become GPLv3
> >licensed. However, linking the result against the GCC support
> >libraries, as is normally required for any program generated
On March 6, 2017 6:29:49 PM GMT+01:00, Ian Lance Taylor via gcc
wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM, wrote:
>>
>> I'm looking into the possibility of adding a SPIR-V
>> (https://www.khronos.org/registry/spir-v) backend to GCC or as a
>> plug-in. The output of which would be binary from the c
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:12 AM, wrote:
>
> I'm looking into the possibility of adding a SPIR-V
> (https://www.khronos.org/registry/spir-v) backend to GCC or as a
> plug-in. The output of which would be binary from the compiler, not
> binutils, with an option to extract a textual representation us
