On 05/06/2017 12:44 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Michael Meissner writes:
This message is separated from the question about moving code, as it is a
questions about the functionality of target_clone support.
Right now it looks like target_clone only generates the ifunc handler if there
is a cal
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:38:03PM -0700, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Michael Meissner
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 12:32:03PM -0700, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> >> Hi Michael,
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Michael Meissner
> >> wrote:
> >> >
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 12:32:03PM -0700, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Michael Meissner
> wrote:
> > This message is separated from the question about moving code, as it is a
> > questions about the functionality of target_clone support.
> >
> > Rig
This message is separated from the question about moving code, as it is a
questions about the functionality of target_clone support.
Right now it looks like target_clone only generates the ifunc handler if there
is a call to the function in the object file. It does not generate the ifunc
handler
