On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:46:10PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 06:17 -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
>
> > BTW, an x86 DFP configure bug was reported 3 months ago. But it still
> > hasn't benen fixed. I opened a DFP bug report:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32
H. J. Lu wrote:
> Good. I have another question. Intel BID patch itself doesn't change
> any sources in DFP nor libdecnummber. The only significant change is
> to change Makefile in libgcc to use Intel BID library for DFP
> intrinsics when BID encoding is selected. Currently, DFP is only
> suppor
It is a libdecnumber bug, which only affects x86.
The patch is ok.
Paolo
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 06:17 -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> BTW, an x86 DFP configure bug was reported 3 months ago. But it still
> hasn't benen fixed. I opened a DFP bug report:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32351
>
> with a patch. I hope it will be fixed before gcc 4.3 is released
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:31:14PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> H. J. Lu wrote:
>
> > Who are those relevant maintainers? Since Intel BID patches only
> > affects DFP intrinsics, which is only supported on Linux/PPC,
> > Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64 while Linux/PPC uses DPD encoding, not
> > BID e
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 05:22:25PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> >BTW, an x86 DFP configure bug was reported 3 months ago. But it still
> >hasn't benen fixed. I opened a DFP bug report:
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32351
> >
> >with a patch. I hope it will be fixed
H. J. Lu wrote:
> Who are those relevant maintainers? Since Intel BID patches only
> affects DFP intrinsics, which is only supported on Linux/PPC,
> Linux/ia32 and Linux/x86-64 while Linux/PPC uses DPD encoding, not
> BID encoding, I assume the relevant maintainers are maintainers for
> DFP, libgc
Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
>> GCC 4.3 Stage 1 is now closed.
>> [...]
>> As previously discussed, the mainline will be in "lockdown" for 1-2
>> weeks, starting midnight tonight. Other then the merges mentioned
>> above, and documentation improvements, the
Hello!
BTW, an x86 DFP configure bug was reported 3 months ago. But it still
hasn't benen fixed. I opened a DFP bug report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32351
with a patch. I hope it will be fixed before gcc 4.3 is released :-).
So, is this bug a configure bug, DFP bug or x
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:39:49PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> in the relatively near future. I am also considering the Intel BID
> patches for 4.3, as those have arrived just under the wire. I would
> appreciate comments from relevant maintainers about those patches.
>
Who are those relevant
On 6/15/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hopefully, the PTR_PLUS branch and the fixed-point branch will be merged
in the relatively near future.
I checked in pointer_plus as revision 125755.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
On 6/15/07, Kaveh R. GHAZI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Timezone please? PDT?
I say JST because that past almost 13 hours ago :). Going to Japan
gets me into that mood.
-- Pinski
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> GCC 4.3 Stage 1 is now closed.
> [...]
> As previously discussed, the mainline will be in "lockdown" for 1-2
> weeks, starting midnight tonight. Other then the merges mentioned
> above, and documentation improvements, the only patches that should be
> c
13 matches
Mail list logo
