On 07/21/2017 12:14 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Sebastian Huber schrieb:
>> Hello,
>>
>> there are some files in gcc/config/* that contain the GCC Runtime
>> Library Exception
>>
>> grep -r --include='*.[ch]' 'GCC Runtime Library Exception' -l
>> gcc/config | wc
>> 186 1865361
>>
>> a
Sebastian Huber schrieb:
Hello,
there are some files in gcc/config/* that contain the GCC Runtime
Library Exception
grep -r --include='*.[ch]' 'GCC Runtime Library Exception' -l gcc/config
| wc
186 1865361
and some files that don't include it
grep -r --include='*.[ch]' 'GCC Ru
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 03:58:35PM +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > > Does it matter? What should be used for new files?
> > I think that in general we should probably use the Runtime Library
> > Exception for header files that might need to be included by a plugin,
> > which means anything that m
On 21/07/17 15:50, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
there are some files in gcc/config/* that contain the GCC Runtime Library
Exception
grep -r --include='*.[ch]' 'GCC Runtime Library Exception' -l gcc/config |
wc
186 1865361
and s
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> there are some files in gcc/config/* that contain the GCC Runtime Library
> Exception
>
> grep -r --include='*.[ch]' 'GCC Runtime Library Exception' -l gcc/config |
> wc
> 186 1865361
>
> and some files that don't include it
>
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:00:33PM -0800, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Ian Lance Taylor:
>
> > After the e-mail flurry, here is my personal summary of the issues
> > regarding the GCC Runtime Library Exception
> > (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gcc-exception.html).
>
> Thanks!
>
> > One way to reso
* Ian Lance Taylor:
> After the e-mail flurry, here is my personal summary of the issues
> regarding the GCC Runtime Library Exception
> (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gcc-exception.html).
Thanks!
> One way to resolve this might be to say that a compilation process
> is Eligible so long as the
Sebastian Redl writes:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> LLVM byte code is generated by LLVM, not gcc. The question here is
>> whether it is desirable to permit using LLVM to generate LLVM byte
>> code and to then use GCC to turn that byte code into machine code.
>> (It will not be desirable
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> LLVM byte code is generated by LLVM, not gcc. The question here is
> whether it is desirable to permit using LLVM to generate LLVM byte
> code and to then use GCC to turn that byte code into machine code.
> (It will not be desirable to apply the exception if GCC i
