RE: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)

2011-10-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Gary Funck [mailto:g...@intrepid.com] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:00 PM To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Joseph S. Myers Subject: Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09) On 09/09/11 09:09:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > [...] What is the status

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)

2011-10-08 Thread Torvald Riegel
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 08:51 -0500, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > Jakub Jelinek writes: > > > In particular, is transactional-memory branch mergeable within > > a month and half, at least some parts of cxx-mem-model branch, > > bitfield lowering? What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph, > > Torvald

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)

2011-09-22 Thread Gary Funck
On 09/09/11 09:09:30, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > [...] What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph, > cilkplus, gupc (I assume at least some of these are 4.8+ material)? For GUPC, we are targeting GCC 4.8. thanks, - Gary

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)

2011-09-13 Thread Jan Hubicka
> On 09/09/2011 03:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> Status >> == >> >> The trunk is in Stage 1, which, if we follow roughly the 4.6 >> release schedule, should end around end of October. >> At this point I'd like to gather the status of the various >> development branches that haven't been merged

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)

2011-09-12 Thread Jeff Law
On 09/09/2011 01:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: bitfield lowering? What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph, cilkplus, gupc (I assume at least some of these are 4.8+ material)? The bits on reload-v2a provide range splitting and a second chance at assigning a hard reg for unallocated allocnos. Th

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)

2011-09-12 Thread Aldy Hernandez
Jakub Jelinek writes: > In particular, is transactional-memory branch mergeable within > a month and half, at least some parts of cxx-mem-model branch, > bitfield lowering? What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph, Torvald and I are looking into getting things merge read, but... The main prob

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)

2011-09-09 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 09/09/2011 03:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Status == The trunk is in Stage 1, which, if we follow roughly the 4.6 release schedule, should end around end of October. At this point I'd like to gather the status of the various development branches that haven't been merged into trunk yet and

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)

2011-09-09 Thread Andrew MacLeod
On 09/09/2011 03:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: In particular, is transactional-memory branch mergeable within a month and half, at least some parts of cxx-mem-model branch, There will certainly be some parts of the branch which would be appropriate for merging with mainline in october. We ough

Re: GCC 4.7.0 Status Report (2011-09-09)

2011-09-09 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Status > == > > The trunk is in Stage 1, which, if we follow roughly the 4.6 > release schedule, should end around end of October. > At this point I'd like to gather the status of the various > development branches that haven't been merged