On 1/25/07, Volker Reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> | Well, there's another serious (wrong-code) bug which should be fixed
IMHO:
> |
> | PR c++/29106 is a C++ front-end issue.
> | It has a one-line fix (plus comment) on the 4.1 branch.
> | Well, actually one should also backport the fix
Hi,
> | Well, there's another serious (wrong-code) bug which should be fixed
IMHO:
> |
> | PR c++/29106 is a C++ front-end issue.
> | It has a one-line fix (plus comment) on the 4.1 branch.
> | Well, actually one should also backport the fix for PR c++/28284 then,
> | which is a two-liner.
> I wa
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Joe Buck wrote:
| It might be worth fixing a couple of wrong-code bugs that are already
| fixed in 4.1 and have very trivial fixes. I don't think it's wise,
| though, to backport fixes from the 4.1 branch that are broken in 4.1.1
| unless there's a really strong justification
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 05:42:31PM +0100, Volker Reichelt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > There were over 250 PRs open against GCC-4.0.4. Almost all of
> > them are "benign" in the sense that we can leave without fixing them
> > in GCC-4.0.4 -- many are already fixed in more recent versions.
> > I'm now givin
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
| On 1/25/07, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
| >
| > | You might want to consider middle-end/28651 given the recent integer
overflow
| > | discussions.
| >
| > Good suggestion!
| >
| > | I c
On 1/25/07, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
| You might want to consider middle-end/28651 given the recent integer overflow
| discussions.
Good suggestion!
| I can do the backport work if you like.
If you could work out a backport by to
Volker Reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| > There were over 250 PRs open against GCC-4.0.4. Almost all of
| > them are "benign" in the sense that we can leave without fixing them
| > in GCC-4.0.4 -- many are already fixed in more recent versions.
| > I'm now giving attention only to
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:
| You might want to consider middle-end/28651 given the recent integer overflow
| discussions.
Good suggestion!
| I can do the backport work if you like.
If you could work out a backport by tomorrow morning (CST), that would
would great.
Thanks!
--
Hi,
> There were over 250 PRs open against GCC-4.0.4. Almost all of
> them are "benign" in the sense that we can leave without fixing them
> in GCC-4.0.4 -- many are already fixed in more recent versions.
> I'm now giving attention only to those PRs marked as blocker or
> critical. I've identifi
On 25 Jan 2007 10:29:27 -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
There were over 250 PRs open against GCC-4.0.4. Almost all of
them are "benign" in the sense that we can leave without fixing them
in GCC-4.0.4 -- many are already fixed in more recent versions.
I'm now giving att
10 matches
Mail list logo
