Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

2005-11-29 Thread Joe Buck
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 08:20:31PM -0800, Jim Wilson wrote: > There isn't enough ia64 maintainer bandwidth to provide detailed > comments on testsuite results on old machines with old tools versions. Sorry I don't have anything newer. I think the results are about as good as what I saw before (

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

2005-11-28 Thread Jim Wilson
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: I would need an ia64 maintainer to comment on this. From There isn't enough ia64 maintainer bandwidth to provide detailed comments on testsuite results on old machines with old tools versions. Basically, it is only me, and I'm also trying to do a hundred other things

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

2005-11-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > At the moment, we have only one bug I consider release critical for 3.4.5. | > middle-end/24804 Produces wrong code | | I put an analysis in the PR. It is a gcse store motion problem. Woaw! Thanks for the detailed ana

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

2005-11-28 Thread Jim Wilson
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: At the moment, we have only one bug I consider release critical for 3.4.5. middle-end/24804 Produces wrong code I put an analysis in the PR. It is a gcse store motion problem. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

2005-11-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | Tests (including Ada tests this time) for i686-pc-linux-gnu on RHEL 3.0 | are at | | http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-11/msg01334.html | | They are essentially perfect (only the one known failure). | | I also ran tests on an x86_64-unknown

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Buck
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:20:21PM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | I'm running the pre-releasing script, so a new prerelease tarball will be > | available today. > > The tarballs are available for download and testing here: > >ftp://gcc.gn

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

2005-11-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I'm running the pre-releasing script, so a new prerelease tarball will be | available today. The tarballs are available for download and testing here: ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-3.4.5-20051128/ -- Gaby

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

2005-11-28 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | | > Mark, RTH, could you provide hints? | | I don't have any ideas, just from looking atthe problem. It could be a | stack allocation problem, where we assign two things the same stack | slot, and get confused. Thanks! -- G

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release Status

2005-11-28 Thread Mark Mitchell
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > Mark, RTH, could you provide hints? I don't have any ideas, just from looking atthe problem. It could be a stack allocation problem, where we assign two things the same stack slot, and get confused. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (916) 791-8304

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release status report

2005-11-22 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I installed the two patches below, in lign with your status report | and plans for 3.4.5 and 3.4.6. Thanks. -- Gaby

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release status report

2005-11-21 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
I installed the two patches below, in lign with your status report and plans for 3.4.5 and 3.4.6. Gerald Index: index.html === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v retrieving revision 1.527 diff -u -3 -p -r1.527 index.html

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release status report

2005-11-21 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"Giovanni Bajo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | > I'm planning a release for the end of the month. | > I've fired the release script to build a pre-release tarball, | > which should be ready any moment now. | | Thanks. Are there official plans for th

Re: GCC-3.4.5 Release status report

2005-11-21 Thread Giovanni Bajo
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm planning a release for the end of the month. > I've fired the release script to build a pre-release tarball, > which should be ready any moment now. Thanks. Are there official plans for the 3.4 branch after this release? -- Giovanni Bajo