* Jakub Jelinek via Gcc:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:27:13AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
>> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 09:18, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>> >
>> > Perhaps the PR should be reopened with “accepts invalid”?
>>
>> My impression from the PR is that the reporter was using a different
>>
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020, 10:34 Jakub Jelinek, wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:27:13AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 09:18, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> > >
> > > Perhaps the PR should be reopened with “accepts invalid”?
> >
> > My impression from the PR is that the report
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 09:18, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Perhaps the PR should be reopened with “accepts invalid”?
My impression from the PR is that the reporter was using a different
ABI, where the name isn't reserved. Maybe the testcase should only be
accepted with -f
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:27:13AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 09:18, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps the PR should be reopened with “accepts invalid”?
>
> My impression from the PR is that the reporter was using a different
> ABI, where the name isn't reserved
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 09:18, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Perhaps the PR should be reopened with “accepts invalid”?
My impression from the PR is that the reporter was using a different
ABI, where the name isn't reserved. Maybe the testcase should only be
accepted with -fno-threadsafe-statics or -ffreest
Nathan Sidwell wrote:
GCC has an extension on machaines with cxx_implicit_extern_c (what used
to be !NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C).
On such targets we'll treat 'extern "C" void Foo ()' as-if the argument
list is variadic. (or something approximating that)
perhaps that is confusing things?
may
GCC has an extension on machaines with cxx_implicit_extern_c (what used to be
!NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C).
On such targets we'll treat 'extern "C" void Foo ()' as-if the argument list is
variadic. (or something approximating that)
perhaps that is confusing things?
nathan
On 9/6/20 4:43 PM, Iain
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 16:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
g++.dg/abi/guard3.C
has:
extern "C" int __cxa_guard_acquire();
Which might not be a suitable declaration, depending on how the ‘extern
“C”’ is supposed to affect the function signature generated.
IF, the exte
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 16:23, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> g++.dg/abi/guard3.C
>
> has:
>
> extern "C" int __cxa_guard_acquire();
>
> Which might not be a suitable declaration, depending on how the ‘extern
> “C”’ is supposed to affect the function signature generated.
>
> IF, the extern C should m
