2012/4/26 Peter A. Felvegi:
> On 04/23/2012 08:20 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> Please check it's not http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926
>> first
>
> Hello,
>
> it seems to be the same issue, quite dated, though.
Yes, we have a number of long-standing bugs to do with
access-check
On 04/23/2012 08:20 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23 April 2012 18:48, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
"Peter A. Felvegi" writes:
Should I file a bug report?
Yes, please. Thanks.
Please check it's not http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926 first
Hello,
it seems to be the same issue, q
On 23 April 2012 18:48, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> "Peter A. Felvegi" writes:
>
>> Should I file a bug report?
>
> Yes, please. Thanks.
Please check it's not http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24926 first
"Peter A. Felvegi" writes:
> Should I file a bug report?
Yes, please. Thanks.
Ian
> Same here (OpenSUSE 10.2, gcc 4.1.3), also for rev. 126127.
This was caused by accidental commit of mine (ie I've commited cse.c
with sharing changes). It is reverted now.
Honza
Same here (OpenSUSE 10.2, gcc 4.1.3), also for rev. 126127.
2007/6/29, Basile STARYNKEVITCH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is it just me, or not?
On my system (Debian/Sid/AMD64 with gcc = 4.1.2 from Debian)
.
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/Lang/gcc-tru
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I investigated a bit, and it seems that unlike gcc.gnu.org, www.gnu.org
> lacks the latest revision (at least) of the bin/preprocess script in our
> wwwdocs module:
>
> revision 1.43
> date: 2006/06/10 21:52:24; author: gerald; state: Exp; lines
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> -> http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc.html
>>
>> Failed Validation of W3C !
>>
>> This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional !
>>
>>
>> W3C rules specify that XHTML tags have to be written in lowercase.
>> You have just to replace every "DIV" by "div
On 3/2/07, Michel Pellegrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-> http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc.html
Failed Validation of W3C !
This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional !
W3C rules specify that XHTML tags have to be written in lowercase.
You have just to replace every "DIV" by "div" and v
Steve Ellcey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do you know if there a GCC bug report for this defect? I couldn't find
> one in bugzilla. I am seeing this problem with IA64 HP-UX on ToT.
Should be fixed now.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfel
Andreas Tobler wrote:
> Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
>>...
>>cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>>../../gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c: In function 'elf_record_gcc_switches':
>>../../gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c:6268: warning: format '%llu' expects type
>>'long long unsigned int', but argument 3
Andreas Tobler wrote:
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
On OSX 1Â0.3 updating to gcc-4.3-20061209 failed with:
...
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
../../gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c: In function
'elf_record_gcc_switches':
../../gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c:6268: warning: format '%llu'
expect
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
On OSX 1Â0.3 updating to gcc-4.3-20061209 failed with:
...
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
../../gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c: In function 'elf_record_gcc_switches':
../../gcc-4.3-20061209/gcc/varasm.c:6268: warning: format '%llu' expects type
'long long unsign
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 12:01:26PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "ld: *_s.o uses VFP instructions, whereas ./libgcc_s.so.1.tmp does not"
>
> (Complete log in attachment).
>
> I found this message quite strange, as libgcc_s.so.1.tmp was the
> output of the linker, so it should have been crea
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 05:44, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> I compared this to an earlier build and I'm sure that the wrong library
> search path is used in this case. It should be:
> Any hints?
It is curious that it got the include options right (-D/-I) but not the
library options (-B/-L).
The option mu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I checked, that the 32-bit libraries were built. That's ok!
cd
/disk1/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-4.1-20051112/gcc-4.1-20051112/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/32/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
ls -l lib* gives:
- -rw-r--r-- 1 em tecosim 7
Rainer Emrich wrote:
ERROR: could not compile testsuite_shared.cc
This is the important bit. The libstdc++ testsuite tried to compile a
support file and failed, so it generated an error. The rest is just a
tcl backtrace which we don't need.
The real question here is why it failed. There
Rainer Emrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.1-test/gcc-4.0.1-test/gcc/xgcc
> -
> -B/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/gcc-4.0.1-test/gcc-4.0.1-test/gcc/
> - -B/SCRATCH/gcc-build/IRIX64/mips-sgi-irix6.5/install/mips-sgi-irix6.5/bin/
> - -B/
18 matches
Mail list logo
