Re: --enable-build-with-cxx vs plugins (Was: Re: Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx)

2010-01-20 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Joern Rennecke writes: > Quoting Ian Lance Taylor : > >> I'm not surprised that plugins don't work > > For Milepost we need both the --enable-build-with-cxx configure option > and plugins. > How is this supposed to work? > Should the person compiling the plugins use C++ to compile the plugin? > O

--enable-build-with-cxx vs plugins (Was: Re: Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx)

2010-01-20 Thread Joern Rennecke
Quoting Ian Lance Taylor : I'm not surprised that plugins don't work For Milepost we need both the --enable-build-with-cxx configure option and plugins. How is this supposed to work? Should the person compiling the plugins use C++ to compile the plugin? Or should the cc1 / cc1plus dso export u

Re: Extra regressions for --enable-build-with-cxx

2010-01-20 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Joern Rennecke writes: > I've tested mainline r156055 with the patch for PR42798 both > with and without --enable-build-with-cxx; a number of testsuites > show additional failures for --enable-build-with-cxx. > > I've attached simple diffs from the gcc to g++ bootstrap regtest > summaries. > > Di