Hi All,
Please suggest if changes are required in the patch.
Thanks,
Sangamesh
On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 11:48 PM swamy sangamesh
wrote:
> Tried with the below change and able to bootstrap on AIX and X86.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree.cc b/gcc/tree.cc
> index e9a83e4260b..b693a58ab9d 100644
> --- a/g
Tried with the below change and able to bootstrap on AIX and X86.
diff --git a/gcc/tree.cc b/gcc/tree.cc
index e9a83e4260b..b693a58ab9d 100644
--- a/gcc/tree.cc
+++ b/gcc/tree.cc
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
#include "stringpool.h"
#include "attribs.h"
#i
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 09:44:50PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Some years ago (well, 5+ honestly) I was using I think 119 to help
> > figure out some endian-specific bugs in a patch I was working on. It
> > is slightly worrying if AIX/power support has bitrotted due to it
> > being kicked off t
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 8:59 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
>
> Am 30.06.25 um 20:47 schrieb Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2025, 17:13 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, wrote:
> >
> >> Am 30.06.25 um 17:17 schrieb Richard Biener via Gcc:
> >>> There used to be access to an AIX system on the co
> Some years ago (well, 5+ honestly) I was using I think 119 to help
> figure out some endian-specific bugs in a patch I was working on. It
> is slightly worrying if AIX/power support has bitrotted due to it
> being kicked off the primary/secondary platforms list, are there any
> other reasonably p
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 10:31 AM swamy sangamesh via Gcc wrote:
>
> Thank you all for your response.
>
> I would be posting regression test results regularly and will work on
> setting up a buildbot for AIX.
>
> I can see that currently the AIX build is broken with the below error.
>
> In file incl
Thank you all for your response.
I would be posting regression test results regularly and will work on
setting up a buildbot for AIX.
I can see that currently the AIX build is broken with the below error.
In file included from ./tm.h:25,
from /opt/freeware/src/packages/BUILD/gcc
On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 1:59 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc
wrote:
> Am 30.06.25 um 20:47 schrieb Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2025, 17:13 Thomas Koenig via Gcc,
> wrote:
> >
> >> Am 30.06.25 um 17:17 schrieb Richard Biener via Gcc:
> >>> There used to be access to an AIX system on the c
Am 30.06.25 um 20:47 schrieb Jonathan Wakely via Gcc:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025, 17:13 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, wrote:
Am 30.06.25 um 17:17 schrieb Richard Biener via Gcc:
There used to be access to an AIX system on the compile farm, but I do
not know about the status of that.
https://portal.cfarm.
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025, 17:13 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, wrote:
> Am 30.06.25 um 17:17 schrieb Richard Biener via Gcc:
> > There used to be access to an AIX system on the compile farm, but I do
> not know about the status of that.
>
> https://portal.cfarm.net/machines/list/ lists
> cfarm111 and cfarm119
Am 30.06.25 um 17:17 schrieb Richard Biener via Gcc:
There used to be access to an AIX system on the compile farm, but I do not know
about the status of that.
https://portal.cfarm.net/machines/list/ lists
cfarm111 and cfarm119 as AIX machines, a POWER7
and POWER8 system, respectively.
Best re
The general criteria for primary, secondary, and tertiary platforms are
described on the page to which you linked.
The choice of level is decided by the GCC Steering Committee in
consultation with the GCC Release Managers and the maintainers for the
targets / platforms.
AIX is an unusual platform
> Am 30.06.2025 um 16:55 schrieb swamy sangamesh via Gcc :
>
> Hi All,
>
> Would like to know the criteria for adding AIX as a secondary platform.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-15/criteria.html
Note we only make changes going forward which means for GCC 16, the set of
primary/secondary targets
13 matches
Mail list logo
