Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-10-18 Thread Sylvain Noiry via Gcc
Hello Toon, the implementation is not finished, we have just made some tests for now. If no one sees huge problems with this new approach, we will continue to implement and stabilize it. Thank you for your interest ! Sylvain On 10/17/23 22:37, Toon Moene wrote: Sylvain, Is this on a branc

Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-10-17 Thread Toon Moene
Sylvain, Is this on a branch in your github repository https://github.com/kalray/gcc somewhere ? That would make it easier to test it for me (and probably others). See for instance my mail here (d.d. Thu Oct 5 14:45:05 GMT 2023): https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2023-October/242643.

Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-10-05 Thread Toon Moene
On 9/26/23 20:40, Toon Moene wrote: On 9/26/23 09:30, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc wrote: As I said at the end of the presentation, we have written a paper which explains our implementation in details. You can find it on the wiki page

Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-09-26 Thread Toon Moene
On 9/26/23 09:30, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc wrote: As I said at the end of the presentation, we have written a paper which explains our implementation in details. You can find it on the wiki page of the Cauldron (https://gcc.gnu.org/w

Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-09-26 Thread Joseph Myers
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023, Sylvain Noiry via Gcc wrote: > --> Idea: Add an attribute to the Tree complex type which specify pure real / > pure >    imaginary / full complex ? If you start from the implementation approach of lowering imaginary type operations in the front end, a flag on a REAL_TYPE wou

Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-09-26 Thread Paul Iannetta via Gcc
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 08:29:16AM +, Tamar Christina via Gcc wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to find you two on Sunday but couldn't locate you. Thanks for the > presentation! Yes, sadly we could not attend on Sunday because we wanted to be back for Monday. > > > > > > We had very interesting disc

Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-09-26 Thread Paul Iannetta via Gcc
nu.org; > > sylvain.no...@hotmail.fr > > Subject: Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 09:30:21AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc > > wrote: > &g

RE: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-09-26 Thread Tamar Christina via Gcc
> -Original Message- > From: Gcc On Behalf > Of Paul Iannetta via Gcc > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 9:54 AM > To: Richard Biener > Cc: Sylvain Noiry ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; > sylvain.no...@hotmail.fr > Subject: Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary &

Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-09-26 Thread Paul Iannetta via Gcc
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 09:30:21AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We had very interesting discussions during our presentation with Paul on > > the > > support of complex numbers in gcc at the Cauldron. > > > >

RE: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-09-26 Thread Tamar Christina via Gcc
Hi, I tried to find you two on Sunday but couldn't locate you. Thanks for the presentation! > > > > We had very interesting discussions during our presentation with Paul > > on the support of complex numbers in gcc at the Cauldron. > > > > Thank you all for your participation ! > > > > Here is a

Re: Complex numbers support: discussions summary

2023-09-26 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:17 PM Sylvain Noiry via Gcc wrote: > > Hi, > > We had very interesting discussions during our presentation with Paul on > the > support of complex numbers in gcc at the Cauldron. > > Thank you all for your participation ! > > Here is a small summary from our viewpoint: >