[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I appreciate that this is quite valid according to the ANSI C
> standard and the team are within their rights to change this,
> but I am curious to know the reasoning behind the change which
> seems to me to make the object code less optimal.
It is not a deliberate cha
On 11/14/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I appreciate that this is quite valid according to the ANSI C
> standard and the team are within their rights to change this,
> but I am curious to know the reasoning behind the change which
> seems to me to make the object code less optim
