* Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote on Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:32:14PM CEST:
>
> I think we're just missing AIX5.2. Ralf you did that last time for the
> svn tarball. Would you please repeat your testing with mpc-0.6?
Sorry for the delay. Issues on AIX 5.2:
- This time, I had an old version of mpc install
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi"
>
>> I've been relaying the messages, (but I haven't seen the MPC webpage
>> updated to reflect this yet).
>
> Okay it's updated, we've got a pretty comprehensive list of platforms.
>
> http://www.multiprecision.org/index.php?prog=mpc&page=platform
From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi"
I've been relaying the messages, (but I haven't seen the MPC webpage
updated to reflect this yet).
Okay it's updated, we've got a pretty comprehensive list of platforms.
http://www.multiprecision.org/index.php?prog=mpc&page=platforms
Thanks everyone for your test resu
From: "Gerald Pfeifer"
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Andreas Tobler wrote:
I've cc'ed others who have access to the platforms in question based on
GCC test results. Please help if you can.
- powerpc-apple-darwin9.6.0 gcc-4.5.0 gmp-4.2.2 mpfr-2.3.1 ok.
- sparc-sun-solaris2.10 gcc-4.4 gmp-4.2.2 mpfr-2.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Andreas Tobler wrote:
>>> I've cc'ed others who have access to the platforms in question based on
>>> GCC test results. Please help if you can.
>>
>> - powerpc-apple-darwin9.6.0 gcc-4.5.0 gmp-4.2.2 mpfr-2.3.1 ok.
>> - sparc-sun-solaris2.10 gcc-4.4 gmp-4.2.2 mpfr-2.3.1 ok
>> -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Built with disable-shared:
- - i686-pc-mingw32 gcc-4.4.0 gmp-4.2.4 mpfr-2.4.1 ok
- - i686-pc-cygwin gcc-4.4.0 gmp-4.2.4 mpfr-2.4.1 ok
Rainer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enig
Andreas Tobler wrote:
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
And report your results along with the versions of target
triplet/compiler/gmp/mpfr that you used.
I've cc'ed others who have access to the platforms in question based
on GCC test results. Please help if you can.
- powerpc-apple-darwin9.6.0 gcc-4
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
And report your results along with the versions of target
triplet/compiler/gmp/mpfr that you used.
I've cc'ed others who have access to the platforms in question based on
GCC test results. Please help if you can.
- powerpc-apple-darwin9.6.0 gcc-4.5.0 gmp-4.2.2 mpfr-2.3
> I.e. we need (primaries) x86-freebsd, x86-darwin, sparc-solaris2.10 and
> (secondaries) hppa-hpux11, ppc-aix5.2, ppc-darwin, x86-mingw32 and
> s390-linux-gnu.
I tested on hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11, hppa64-hp-hpux11.11, ia64-hp-hpux11.23,
and ia64-debian-linux-gnu using GCC 4.2.1, MPFR 2.3.1, and GMP
Hi,
> I.e. we need (primaries) x86-freebsd, x86-darwin, sparc-solaris2.10 and
> (secondaries) hppa-hpux11, ppc-aix5.2, ppc-darwin, x86-mingw32 and
> s390-linux-gnu.
I've tested with:
gmp-4.2.2-7 (fedora core 9)
mpfr-2.4.1 (vanilla)
gcc 4.3.2
mpc-0.6
The mpc testsuite is clean on s390-linux-
From: "Janis Johnson"
I get the failure Richard mentioned when I use -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fstack-protector but no failures without those options. This is on
powerpc64-linux (but defaulting to -m32) with:
RHEL 5.3
GCC 4.3.2
GMP 4.2.4
MPFR 2.4.1
MPC 0.6
Okay the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 bug has b
From: "Jakub Jelinek"
man 3p sprintf says:
If copying takes place between objects that overlap as a result of a call
to
sprintf() or snprintf(), the results are undefined.
ISO C99 7.19.6.6 has similar wording:
If copying takes place between objects that overlap, the behavior is
undefined
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:55:29PM -0700, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> From: "Marc Glisse"
> >This could be related to a call to sprintf(str,...,str,...), which
> >according to the doc is undefined behaviour.
>
> Doc? I don't see it in the man page. Got a url?
man 3p sprintf says:
If copying take
From: "Marc Glisse"
This could be related to a call to sprintf(str,...,str,...), which
according to the doc is undefined behaviour.
Doc? I don't see it in the man page. Got a url?
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
Ah, that helps. I was able to reproduce the failure using just
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2. However when I used both -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 *and*
-fstack-protector the error went away again.
I'm using gcc-4.1.2 if that matters, perhaps there's a bug in
-fstac
From: "Janis Johnson"
Same behavior with openSUSE 11.1 (glibc 2.9, gcc 4.3.2, gmp 4.2.3, mpfr
2.3.2).
Note that I build with -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector.
I get the failure Richard mentioned when I use -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-fstack-protector but no failures without those options. Th
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 23:21 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi
> wrote:
> > From: "Richard Guenther"
> >
> >> I tested on openSUSE Factory which currently has gcc 4.3.3, gmp 4.2.3,
> >> mpfr 2.4.1 and some pre-2.10 glibc.
> >
> > I tried with vanilla
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> From: "Richard Guenther"
>
>> I tested on openSUSE Factory which currently has gcc 4.3.3, gmp 4.2.3,
>> mpfr 2.4.1 and some pre-2.10 glibc.
>
> I tried with vanilla mpfr-2.4.1 and gmp-4.2.3, and mpc still passed all it's
> tests on gcc14.
From: "Richard Guenther"
I tested on openSUSE Factory which currently has gcc 4.3.3, gmp 4.2.3,
mpfr 2.4.1 and some pre-2.10 glibc.
I tried with vanilla mpfr-2.4.1 and gmp-4.2.3, and mpc still passed all it's
tests on gcc14. Would it be fair to suspect something in your prerelease
glibc?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> From: "Richard Guenther"
>>
>> I get 1 failure on linux-{i586,x86_64,ppc,ppc64,ia64,s390,s390x}
>> platforms:
>>
>> inp_str.c:131: MPC assertion failed: n == nread
>> /bin/sh: line 4: 2347 Aborted (core dumped) ${dir}$tst
>
From: "Richard Guenther"
I get 1 failure on linux-{i586,x86_64,ppc,ppc64,ia64,s390,s390x}
platforms:
inp_str.c:131: MPC assertion failed: n == nread
/bin/sh: line 4: 2347 Aborted (core dumped) ${dir}$tst
FAIL: tio_str
Richard.
Thanks for the thorough testing!
I don't get
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who tested the prerelease snashot of MPC. The
> maintainers have now released mpc-0.6 which incorporates hopefully
> everyone's feedback and testing results.
>
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/pipermail/mpc-discuss/2009-Apri
22 matches
Mail list logo
