On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > while typeof was enabled by default for -std=gnu* anyway
> > in previous releases so is a lower risk.
>
> Do the semantics of typeof change to align with C++, so that typeof
> (int) becomes invalid?
No. Both typeof (expr) and typeof (type) are val
* Joseph Myers:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
>
>> Do you have a list of C2X features that are likely to impact autoconf
>> tests? Or planned changes in the GCC 13 and 14 default language modes
>> that reject constructs previous accepted as an extension?
>
> I think by far
On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
> Do you have a list of C2X features that are likely to impact autoconf
> tests? Or planned changes in the GCC 13 and 14 default language modes
> that reject constructs previous accepted as an extension?
I think by far the biggest risk - for bui
On Friday, 21 October 2022 21:55:53 CEST Florian Weimer wrote:
> That's the implicit function declaration/implicit int change. This
> won't happen in GCC 13, it's too late for that. I tried to make this
> change a couple of years in Fedora, and just flipping the compiler
> flag Does Not Work. I
On Friday, 21 October 2022 21:14:54 CEST Marek Polacek via Gcc wrote:
> commit 0a91bdaf177409a2a5e7895bce4f0e7091b4b3ca
> Author: Joseph Myers
> Date: Wed Sep 7 13:56:25 2022 +
>
> c: New C2x keywords
>
> which says:
>
> As with the removal of unprototyped functions, this change h
* Arsen Arsenović:
> On Friday, 21 October 2022 21:14:54 CEST Marek Polacek via Gcc wrote:
>> commit 0a91bdaf177409a2a5e7895bce4f0e7091b4b3ca
>> Author: Joseph Myers
>> Date: Wed Sep 7 13:56:25 2022 +
>>
>> c: New C2x keywords
>>
>> which says:
>>
>> As with the removal of unprot
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 08:31:09PM +0200, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
> * Joseph Myers:
>
> > I'm working on adding various C2x features to the C front end (and
> > elsewhere in GCC as applicable).
> >
> > I suspect I won't get all the C2x features done for GCC 13. If anyone
> > else is inter
* Joseph Myers:
> I'm working on adding various C2x features to the C front end (and
> elsewhere in GCC as applicable).
>
> I suspect I won't get all the C2x features done for GCC 13. If anyone
> else is interested in adding C2x features, I'd encourage looking at some
> of the following, which
