On Thu, 17 Oct 2024, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > I'm not sure such a warning particularly helps, however; any ABI
> > incompatibility occurs at the point where someone changes their code to
> > stop defining bool and to use the standard bool instead. (And any problem
> > code would already have
* Joseph Myers:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Jakub Jelinek via Gcc:
>>
>> > Are some of the papers/features known to be fully implemented (since which
>> > version)? E.g. for __VA_OPT__ I remember doing (and Jason too) various
>> > fixes
>> > in the past few years, like P
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jakub Jelinek via Gcc:
>
> > Are some of the papers/features known to be fully implemented (since which
> > version)? E.g. for __VA_OPT__ I remember doing (and Jason too) various
> > fixes
> > in the past few years, like PR89971, PR103415, PR101488
* Jakub Jelinek via Gcc:
> Are some of the papers/features known to be fully implemented (since which
> version)? E.g. for __VA_OPT__ I remember doing (and Jason too) various fixes
> in the past few years, like PR89971, PR103415, PR101488. Not really sure
> what exactly C23 requires.
Can we add
On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
> The cppreference page mentions as unimplemented on the GCC side
> N2653 - Type change of u8 string literals
commit 703837b2cc8ac03c53ac7cc0fb1327055acaebd2
Author: Tom Honermann
Date: Tue Aug 2 14:36:01 2022 -0400
C: Implement C2X N2653
Am Mittwoch, dem 16.10.2024 um 13:27 +0200 schrieb Jakub Jelinek via Gcc:
> Hi!
>
> https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/compiler_support
> has a table with compiler support for C23.
> I've added #embed and [[unsequenced]]/[[reproducible]] in there
> yesterday, but am wondering about the accuracy of th
