Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-21 Thread willus.com
On 1/18/2012 10:37 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, willus.com wrote: For those who might be interested, I've recently benchmarked gcc 4.6.3 (and 3.4.2) vs. Intel v11 and Microsoft (in Windows 7) here: http://willus.com/ccomp_benchmark2.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsof

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-20 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:43 AM, willus.com wrote: > On 1/19/2012 6:29 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:27 PM, willus.com  wrote: >>> >>> On 1/19/2012 2:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Marc Glisse  wrote: > > On Wed,

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread Miles Bader
"willus.com" writes: >> For the math functions, this is normally more a libc feature, so you >> might get very different results on different OS. Then again, by using >> -ffast-math, you allow the math functions to return any random value, >> so I can think of ways to make it even faster ;-) > > I

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread Tim Prince
On 1/19/2012 9:24 PM, willus.com wrote: On 1/18/2012 10:37 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, willus.com wrote: For those who might be interested, I've recently benchmarked gcc 4.6.3 (and 3.4.2) vs. Intel v11 and Microsoft (in Windows 7) here: http://willus.com/ccomp_benchmark2.shtml

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread willus.com
On 1/19/2012 6:29 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:27 PM, willus.com wrote: On 1/19/2012 2:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Marc Glissewrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, willus.com wrote: For those who might be interested, I've recently bench

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread willus.com
On 1/18/2012 10:37 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, willus.com wrote: For those who might be interested, I've recently benchmarked gcc 4.6.3 (and 3.4.2) vs. Intel v11 and Microsoft (in Windows 7) here: http://willus.com/ccomp_benchmark2.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsof

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread Oleg Smolsky
Nice work! The only think is that you didn't enable WPO/LTCG on VC++ builds, so that test is a little skewed... On 2012/1/18 20:35, willus.com wrote: Hello, For those who might be interested, I've recently benchmarked gcc 4.6.3 (and 3.4.2) vs. Intel v11 and Microsoft (in Windows 7) here: ht

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread Xinliang David Li
libacml from AMD is also a good candidate to try: http://www.ualberta.ca/AICT/RESEARCH/LinuxClusters/doc/acml350/Linking_002fWindows.html David On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: >> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, willus.com wrote

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread Tim Prince
On 1/19/2012 9:27 AM, willus.com wrote: On 1/19/2012 2:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, willus.com wrote: For those who might be interested, I've recently benchmarked gcc 4.6.3 (and 3.4.2) vs. Intel v11 and Microsoft (in W

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 3:27 PM, willus.com wrote: > On 1/19/2012 2:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Marc Glisse  wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, willus.com wrote: >>> For those who might be interested, I've recently benchmarked gcc 4.6.3 (and 3.4

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread willus.com
On 1/19/2012 2:59 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, willus.com wrote: For those who might be interested, I've recently benchmarked gcc 4.6.3 (and 3.4.2) vs. Intel v11 and Microsoft (in Windows 7) here: http://willus.com/ccomp

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! > > For the math functions, this is normally more a libc feature, so you might > > get very different results on different OS. Then again, by using > > -ffast-math, you allow the math functions to return any random value, so I > > can think of ways to make it even faster ;-) > > Also for ma

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-19 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, willus.com wrote: > >> For those who might be interested, I've recently benchmarked gcc 4.6.3 >> (and 3.4.2) vs. Intel v11 and Microsoft (in Windows 7) here: >> >> http://willus.com/ccomp_benchmark2.shtml > > > http://en.wi

Re: C Compiler benchmark: gcc 4.6.3 vs. Intel v11 and others

2012-01-18 Thread Marc Glisse
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, willus.com wrote: For those who might be interested, I've recently benchmarked gcc 4.6.3 (and 3.4.2) vs. Intel v11 and Microsoft (in Windows 7) here: http://willus.com/ccomp_benchmark2.shtml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows_SDK#64-bit_development For the m