Re: C++11 code in the gcc 10 branch

2021-01-01 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Dez 31 2020, FX via Gcc wrote: > I also wanted to ask approval to commit this diff below, fixing > aarch64_get_extension_string_for_isa_flags()’s prototype to align it with the > actual function definition: > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/driver-aarch64.c > b/gcc/config/aarch64/driver-aa

Re: C++11 code in the gcc 10 branch

2021-01-01 Thread Iain Sandoe
FX wrote: If Richard approves the second patch (and you’re stuck for time) - then send me the patch(es) as attachments with the commit credits you want, and I can apply them for you. Both patches only needed on gcc-10, if you can commit that’s great, many thanks. bootstrapped / smoke t

Re: C++11 code in the gcc 10 branch

2020-12-31 Thread FX via Gcc
> If Richard approves the second patch (and you’re stuck for time) - then send > me the patch(es) as attachments with the commit credits you want, and I can > apply them for you. Both patches only needed on gcc-10, if you can commit that’s great, many thanks. For credits in GCC I’m known as Fra

Re: C++11 code in the gcc 10 branch

2020-12-31 Thread Iain Sandoe
FX wrote: When are you going to apply your fix that Richard S. approved on the 21st? When I remember how to set up gcc’s git with write access, and remember how the new ChangeLog entries work. The times where I was a regular contributor were the CVS and SVN times. I also wanted to ask a

Re: C++11 code in the gcc 10 branch

2020-12-31 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc
FX writes: >> When are you going to apply your fix that Richard S. approved on the >> 21st? > > When I remember how to set up gcc’s git with write access, and remember how > the new ChangeLog entries work. The times where I was a regular contributor > were the CVS and SVN times. > > I also wante

Re: C++11 code in the gcc 10 branch

2020-12-31 Thread FX via Gcc
> When are you going to apply your fix that Richard S. approved on the > 21st? When I remember how to set up gcc’s git with write access, and remember how the new ChangeLog entries work. The times where I was a regular contributor were the CVS and SVN times. I also wanted to ask approval to com

Re: C++11 code in the gcc 10 branch

2020-12-31 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, FX via Gcc wrote: > I’m trying to bootstrap a GCC 10 compiler on macOS with clang, and I am > getting errors in stage 1, because there is C++11 code that is rejected > by clang (because the bootstrap involves compiling stage 1 with > -std=gnu++98, online on master (see top-l

Re: C++11 code in the gcc 10 branch

2020-12-21 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc
FX via Gcc writes: > I’m trying to bootstrap a GCC 10 compiler on macOS with clang, and I am > getting errors in stage 1, because there is C++11 code that is rejected by > clang (because the bootstrap involves compiling stage 1 with -std=gnu++98, > online on master (see top-level configure.ac).

Re: C++11 code in the gcc 10 branch

2020-12-21 Thread Iain Sandoe
FX via Gcc wrote: but later I am getting further errors: ../../gcc/gcc/config/darwin.c:1357:16: error: no viable conversion from 'poly_uint16' (aka 'poly_int<2, unsigned short>') to 'unsigned int' unsigned int modesize = GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode); ^ ~