On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> This almost works but libstdc++-v3/configure.ac explicitly
> checks $with_newlib to trip some AC_DEFINE's which have
> to be tripped to build. I have a patch attached that logically
> says if on target X, then you are always using newlib so
> if you have
On 01/28/2011 05:48 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 01/28/2011 09:17 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Andreas Schwab writes:
Ralf Corsepius writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
But that seems strange to me as some of the configure scripts test f
On 01/28/2011 09:17 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Andreas Schwab writes:
Ralf Corsepius writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
But that seems strange to me as some of the configure scripts test for
--with-newlib and adjust their configury ac
On 01/28/2011 04:17 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Andreas Schwab writes:
Ralf Corsepius writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
But that seems strange to me as some of the configure scripts test for
--with-newlib and adjust their configury ac
Andreas Schwab writes:
> Ralf Corsepius writes:
>
>> - Remove newlib from the source tree
>
> --without-newlib should probably be enough.
But that seems strange to me as some of the configure scripts test for
--with-newlib and adjust their configury accordingly. This would put
them in a positi
On 01/28/2011 04:58 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/28/2011 10:15 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Corsepius writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
Good point, agreed.
In case of Joel and rtems the situation probably can be furtherly
simplif
On 01/28/2011 10:15 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Corsepius writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
Good point, agreed.
In case of Joel and rtems the situation probably can be furtherly
simplified:
RTEMS has gcc-4.5.5-compiled newlib-rp
Ralf Corsepius writes:
> - Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
On 01/28/2011 07:49 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Ralf Corsepius writes:
On 01/27/2011 07:15 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
What is the preferred combination of
--enable-newlib and --with-newlib settings
to build with newlib in the gcc source tree
but not build it and use the installed copy
for the
Ralf Corsepius writes:
> On 01/27/2011 07:15 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> What is the preferred combination of
>> --enable-newlib and --with-newlib settings
>> to build with newlib in the gcc source tree
>> but not build it and use the installed copy
>> for the Ada and Go builds?
>
> Theoretical
On 01/27/2011 07:15 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi,
There are now 14 RTEMS targets which I try to
test regularly on the head. Where possible,
I try to test C, C++, Ada, and Go. The procedure
is roughly
+ build and install C, C++ with newlib multilibed
+ build and install RTEMS
+ build and install
11 matches
Mail list logo
