On 11/10/2011 06:30 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
>> I've recently noticed that several of our target libraries are not
>> properly (if at all) represented as bugzilla components. The following
>> table shows the current situation:
>>
>> directory
Rainer Orth writes:
> The entries in parens are only covered indirectly and may or may not
> warrant their own components. I'd argue that it would be helpful to
> have libada and libgo components of their own (while libcpp would
> probably be overkill), but of course that's ultimately up to the
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Rainer Orth wrote:
> I've recently noticed that several of our target libraries are not
> properly (if at all) represented as bugzilla components. The following
> table shows the current situation:
>
> directory component
You omitted boehm-gc and zlib, both used
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 14:22 +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> I think that at least some of the gaps need to be filled, notably libgcc
> (recently bugs have been filed under other), libitm (new with the
> trans-mem merge, but fits nowhere else)
Something for libitm would probably make sense (or "trans-m
> I think we should have different components only if we have different
> maintainers for them (or, if they do not naturally belong to another
> component).
Right, precisely for Ada that would be the same set of people.
> Note that most bug submitters confuse the bug component with the
> language
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> The entries in parens are only covered indirectly and may or may not
>> warrant their own components. I'd argue that it would be helpful to
>> have libada and libgo components of their own (while libcpp would
>> probably be overkill), but
> The entries in parens are only covered indirectly and may or may not
> warrant their own components. I'd argue that it would be helpful to
> have libada and libgo components of their own (while libcpp would
> probably be overkill), but of course that's ultimately up to the
> respective maintaine
