Art Haas writes:
> I've had no success lately getting GCC to bootstrap successfully. My
> last successful bootstrap was on September 6; my builds on September
> 7 through today all end with a comparison failure. Here's the end
> of my build log:
>
> gmake[2]: Entering directory `/export/home/arth
Hi Art,
> This morning's build on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 failed for me; the error
> message in 'stage_2' is below:
>
> options.c:753:3: error: enum conversion in initialization is invalid in C++
> [-Werror=c++-compat]
> options.c:753:3: error: (near initialization for
> 'global_options_init.x_spa
From: Rainer Orth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:18:50 +0200 (MEST)
> Eric Botcazou writes:
>
> > Confirmed (on Solaris 9). Would you mind opening a PR? There is already
> > one
> > for Linux (37344) but the failure is a little different. Thanks in advance.
>
> Sure, done: PR
Eric Botcazou writes:
> Confirmed (on Solaris 9). Would you mind opening a PR? There is already one
> for Linux (37344) but the failure is a little different. Thanks in advance.
Sure, done: PR bootstrap/37424.
Rainer
> When I tried mainline bootstrap on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 as of 20080903
> (rev 139939), I get a configure failure in stage2 libgcc:
>
> checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in
> `/vol/gccsrc/obj/gcc-4.4.0-20080903/11-gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.11/libgcc':
> configure: error: canno
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>> It is a temporary branch, branches/ira-merge, to track
>> IRA related problems.
>>
H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H.J. Lu wrote:
It is a temporary branch, branches/ira-merge, to track
IRA related problems.
Same issue.
Does trunk bootstrap with revision 139589?
No, gcc version 4.4.0 20080905 (experimental) [trunk
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
>
It is a temporary branch, branches/ira-merge, to track
IRA related problems.
>>> Same issue.
>>
>> Does trunk bootstrap with revision 139589?
>>
>>
> No, gcc version 4.4.0 20080905 (experimen
H.J. Lu wrote:
It is a temporary branch, branches/ira-merge, to track
IRA related problems.
Same issue.
Does trunk bootstrap with revision 139589?
No, gcc version 4.4.0 20080905 (experimental) [trunk revision 140042] (GCC)
Andreas
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Andreas Tobler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Rainer Orth wrote:
Looks like a code generation bug to me. I'll try to start a reghunt
asap.
Start around the
H.J. Lu wrote:
Can you try ira-merge branch? It has all IRA bug fixes without non-IRA
changes.
How is it named? ira-merge? If, I can't find it on
http://gcc.gnu.org/svn.html.
It is a temporary branch, branches/ira-merge, to track
IRA related problems.
Thanks, co right now.
Andreas
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rainer Orth wrote:
>>>
Looks like a code generation bug to me. I'll try to start a reghunt
asap.
>>>
>>>
H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rainer Orth wrote:
Looks like a code generation bug to me. I'll try to start a reghunt asap.
Start around the 25/26th of August. IRA.
Since then it is borked.
Can you try ira-merge branch? It has al
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Andreas Tobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rainer Orth wrote:
>
>> Looks like a code generation bug to me. I'll try to start a reghunt asap.
>
> Start around the 25/26th of August. IRA.
>
> Since then it is borked.
>
Can you try ira-merge branch? It has all IRA b
Rainer Orth wrote:
Looks like a code generation bug to me. I'll try to start a reghunt asap.
Start around the 25/26th of August. IRA.
Since then it is borked.
Andreas
Art Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My build attempts on sparc-sun-solaris2.10 haven't been working well
> since the IRA merge, but given the scope of that change and the fixes
> applied since the merge I'm certain the build will be in good shape
> soon.
>
> This morning's build attempt failed
> Zack - using your latest genconditions.c patch plus this one:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-01/msg00951.html
> was sufficient to get a C-only bootstrap working on solaris2.10 using
> cc for stage1.
>
> I'm going to run a full test, but that'll take many many hours
> longer.
Ok, I've n
> The appended patch (superseding the earlier one, Kaveh) should fix
> both these issues. I have to run off to school and won't be able to
> do anything more till this evening, but please let me know how it
> goes.
> zw
Zack - using your latest genconditions.c patch plus this one:
http://gcc
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:55:32PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> Okay, now I get:
[...]
>"build/gencondmd.c", line 60: incomplete struct/union/enum c_test:
> insn_conditions
>"build/gencondmd.c", line 1952: warning: syntax error: empty initializer
>"build/gencondmd.c", line 1952: can
> I'm not entirely understanding why this breaks now when
> insn-conditions.o was fine, but a potential big-hammer fix is to put
> #if GCC_VERSION >= 3001 ... #endif around most of the includes, like
> in the appended patch. Would you please try it?
> zw
>
> * genconditions.c (write_h
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:29:08PM -0500, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> I'm getting the following new bootstrap failure on both
> sparc-sun-solaris2.10 and sparc64-sun-solaris2.10 when using cc for
> stage1:
>
> > "build/gencondmd.c", line 1943: warning: syntax error: empty initializer
> > "build/gen
On Jan 24, 2006, at 10:41 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
Not this issue again :(.
I thought I fixed it the last time it came up.
-- Pinski
URL?
Maybe I did not fix it but it was a problem in the past.
This was PR 18058 for 4.0.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18058
-- Pinski
> Not this issue again :(.
> I thought I fixed it the last time it came up.
> -- Pinski
URL?
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jan 24, 2006, at 10:29 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
I'm getting the following new bootstrap failure on both
sparc-sun-solaris2.10 and sparc64-sun-solaris2.10 when using cc for
stage1:
At least some of this (e.g. bitmap_zero_bits) is due to uses in static
inline functions where "inline" gets def
25 matches
Mail list logo
