"Steven Bosscher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the mipsel-linux case, we ended up with a diamond region where the
> jump in the IF-block was folded, so that we could extend the path
> along one of the diamond's arms with the JOIN-block. This could
> happen because cse_main traversed the basic b
On 12/12/06, Kaz Kojima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Steven Bosscher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In that case, this is a different problem, probably caused by the new
> out-of-SSA pass. But to be sure, I suggest you revert my CSE patch
> and see if that makes the problem go away for you.
I've
"Steven Bosscher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In that case, this is a different problem, probably caused by the new
> out-of-SSA pass. But to be sure, I suggest you revert my CSE patch
> and see if that makes the problem go away for you.
I've confirmed that that problem is remained after reverti
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 15:16 +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On 12/11/06, Kaz Kojima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It seems that the first tree dump which differs before and
> > after r119711 is .099t.optimized.
>
> In that case, this is a different problem, probably caused by the new
> out-of-SSA
On 12/11/06, Kaz Kojima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems that the first tree dump which differs before and
after r119711 is .099t.optimized.
In that case, this is a different problem, probably caused by the new
out-of-SSA pass. But to be sure, I suggest you revert my CSE patch
and see if th
David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From svn r119726 (Sun, 10 Dec 2006) I am getting an ICE during
> bootstrap on mipsel-linux. This is a new failure since Wed Dec 6
> 06:34:07 UTC 2006 (revision 119575) which bootstrapped and tested just
> fine. I don't really want to do a regression hu
On 12/11/06, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lets assume that it doesn't effect i686 or x86_64. Because if it did,
someone else would have been hit by it by now.
I'm sure it doesn't, I bootstrapped&tested on those targets (and on ia64).
So you would need a mips[el]-linux system in ord
Steven Bosscher wrote:
On 12/11/06, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From svn r119726 (Sun, 10 Dec 2006) I am getting an ICE during
bootstrap on mipsel-linux. This is a new failure since Wed Dec 6
06:34:07 UTC 2006 (revision 119575) which bootstrapped and tested just
fine. I don't reall
On 12/11/06, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From svn r119726 (Sun, 10 Dec 2006) I am getting an ICE during
bootstrap on mipsel-linux. This is a new failure since Wed Dec 6
06:34:07 UTC 2006 (revision 119575) which bootstrapped and tested just
fine. I don't really want to do a regressio
