H. J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:39:41AM +0100, Paul Thomas wrote:
H. J
This regtests OK and simplifies things somewhat:
What is this format? I don't think I can apply it cleanly?
I am not surprised - I tried to cut and paste from a large patch that I
am working on.
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 12:39:41AM +0100, Paul Thomas wrote:
> H. J
>
> This regtests OK and simplifies things somewhat:
>
What is this format? I don't think I can apply it cleanly?
H.J.
---
> Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
> ==
H. J
This regtests OK and simplifies things somewhat:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (revision 110407)
--- gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (working copy)
*** gfc_conv_expr_descriptor (gfc_se
H. J,
<>Also why are there duplicated
On the face of , that is very odd. It looks as if the charlen_ is
obtained, the type obtained and the charlen done over again. I will have
a look today.
Thanks
Paul
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 06:03:12PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 05:57:04PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > Around line 3923 in fortran/trans-array.c, there are
> >
> > if (expr->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER)
> > {
> > gcc_assert (expr->ts.cl && expr->ts.cl->len
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 05:57:04PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> Around line 3923 in fortran/trans-array.c, there are
>
> if (expr->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER)
> {
> gcc_assert (expr->ts.cl && expr->ts.cl->length
> && expr->ts.cl->length->expr_type == EXPR_CON
