Dorit Nuzman wrote:
(would be intereting to see an example for a loop that is now vectorized
and didn't vectorize before, if you have that information available)
Unfortunately not - it caught me by surprise (on a routine recompile /
rerun of a fixed test-case). Otherwise I would at least hav
> L.S.,
>
> I noticed some unexpected progress last night (as opposed to about a
> week ago).
>
> Previous figures:
>
> 5316 loops vectorized
> 6060 loops not vectorized
>
> New figures:
>
> 5188 loops vectorized
> 6189 loops not vectorized
>
> i.e., 201 loops *more* recognized by the vectorizer, o
I wrote:
5188 loops vectorized
Dang ! Should be 5388 of course, otherwise the math doesn't add up.
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.indiv.nluug.nl/~toon/
GNU Fortran's path to
