On Wed, 25 Aug 2021, 03:37 NightStrike, wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:48 AM David Malcolm wrote:
> > Thanks for working through the above.
> >
> > Do you have an account in GCC's bugzilla? If so, please can you turn
> > this into a bug report there. Is there a recipe for testing this via
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:48 AM David Malcolm wrote:
> Thanks for working through the above.
>
> Do you have an account in GCC's bugzilla? If so, please can you turn
> this into a bug report there. Is there a recipe for testing this via
> wine? (it's been almost 20 years since I did any Windows
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 14:32, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 13:49, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Is there a recipe for testing this via
> > wine? (it's been almost 20 years since I did any Windows coding...)
>
> I use this for running libstdc++ tests under Wine:
>
> Xvfb :9 -screen
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 at 13:49, David Malcolm wrote:
> Is there a recipe for testing this via
> wine? (it's been almost 20 years since I did any Windows coding...)
I use this for running libstdc++ tests under Wine:
Xvfb :9 -screen 0 1024x768x16 &
trap 'kill %1' EXIT
# Start wine on the dummy X ser
On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 22:36 -0400, NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 8:16 PM NightStrike
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:09 PM David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> > > Which tests are failing, specifically?
>
> Here's the full list of all 37 failures that fail for any reason:
>
> FAIL:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 8:16 PM NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:09 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> > Which tests are failing, specifically?
Here's the full list of all 37 failures that fail for any reason:
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/dot-output.c dg-check-dot dot-output.c.state-purge.dot
FAI
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:09 PM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 09:52 -1000, NightStrike wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > Many of the analyzer tests fail on windows because they hardcode in
> > the
> > typedef of size_t to be unsigned long. This is not a platform
> > independent
> > defini
On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 09:52 -1000, NightStrike wrote:
> David,
>
> Many of the analyzer tests fail on windows because they hardcode in
> the
> typedef of size_t to be unsigned long. This is not a platform
> independent
> definition, though, and is wrong for 64 bit windows. This causes
> extra
> wa
