On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:01:37 +0300 (EEST)
Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> Replying to myself, I was just informed (thanks hp!) that there is the
> "URL" field in bugzilla, where the owner of the bug can add one relevant
> URL. I tried it and it's very useful, it would be even better if I could
>
> From: Dimitrios Apostolou
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:25:49 +0200
> Hi hp, thanks for the notes, I'm just going to highlight my point of view.
>
> Regarding patch pinging, my take is that is should be seldom necessary,
> for example I tend to forget my small patches after sometime.
Me too, s
Does anyone have experience with Patchwork? It sounds like it works
with a mailing list with less requirement for special markup than
dannyb's tracker had.
Jason
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson
wrote:
> On a whim I hosted a BOF at the GNU tools cauldron yesterday,
> titled "pending patches" (no compliance with RFC5434 intended).
Thanks for the notes. I want to add one point. There are a number of
useful tools that we can imagine. How
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
* Have a field in the bugzilla keeping "related ML threads" URLs. What I do
now is post a separate comment saying "discussed here" or "posted patch
here". Not sure if good enough, but on bugs I've not seen it in cases I
needed to.
Replying to m
Hi hp, thanks for the notes, I'm just going to highlight my point of view.
Regarding patch pinging, my take is that is should be seldom necessary,
for example I tend to forget my small patches after sometime. So IMHO
anyone replying anything is good, especially if he CCs the maintainer
(Dodji-
