Re: AArch64 and -moutline-atomics

2020-05-20 Thread Florian Weimer via Gcc
* Szabolcs Nagy: > The 05/20/2020 09:02, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: >> * Richard Henderson: >> > On 5/19/20 3:38 AM, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: >> >> One minor improvement would be to document __aarch64_have_lse_atomics as >> >> interposable on the GCC side and define that directly in glibc,

Re: AArch64 and -moutline-atomics

2020-05-20 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
The 05/20/2020 09:02, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: > * Richard Henderson: > > On 5/19/20 3:38 AM, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: > >> One minor improvement would be to document __aarch64_have_lse_atomics as > >> interposable on the GCC side and define that directly in glibc, so that > >> lse-init.o

Re: AArch64 and -moutline-atomics

2020-05-20 Thread Florian Weimer via Gcc
* Richard Henderson: > On 5/19/20 3:38 AM, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: >> One minor improvement would be to document __aarch64_have_lse_atomics as >> interposable on the GCC side and define that directly in glibc, so that >> lse-init.o is not linked in anymore and __aarch64_have_lse_atomics can

Re: AArch64 and -moutline-atomics

2020-05-19 Thread Richard Henderson
On 5/19/20 3:38 AM, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote: > One minor improvement would be to document __aarch64_have_lse_atomics as > interposable on the GCC side and define that directly in glibc, so that > lse-init.o is not linked in anymore and __aarch64_have_lse_atomics can > be initialized as soon as