Re: A question about varargs

2008-07-16 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The value is too big for a long long. When you specify the type, gcc >> is forced to convert (I hope you can get a warning for that). When >> you don't specify the type, gcc does not convert. The resulting value >> has a type which can only be expr

Re: A question about varargs

2008-07-16 Thread Mohamed Shafi
2008/7/16 Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > "Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I am involved in the porting of gcc 4.1.2 for 16 bit target. For this >> target size of long long is 32bits. For the following code >> >> #define VALUE 0x1B4E81B4E81B4DLL > > That is not a 32-bit valu

Re: A question about varargs

2008-07-16 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Mohamed Shafi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am involved in the porting of gcc 4.1.2 for 16 bit target. For this > target size of long long is 32bits. For the following code > > #define VALUE 0x1B4E81B4E81B4DLL That is not a 32-bit value. > #define AFTER 0x55 > > //void test (int n, long lon