Hi Karel,
>>> With Solaris 9 support gone on mainline, this can be revisited now, but
>>> this won't change anything for released versions.
>>
>> What shall I do for this to be at least considered?
>
> Nothing: it's already on my agenda to fix this for 4.10/5.0, thanks to
> your report :-) The on
Rainer Orth writes:
>>> Apart from that, why are you invoking gcc with -x assembler-with-cpp
>>> when the input is clearly anything but assembler input? You're
>>> obviously lying to the compiler, and I'd go as far as claiming that you
>>> get what you deserve: garbage in, garbage out.
>>
>> :-)
Hi Karel,
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>> Hi Karel,
>>
>>> More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
>>> which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
>>> without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
Hi Rainer,
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 11:04 PM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> Hi Karel,
>
>> More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
>> which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
>> without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
>> Solar
Hi Karel,
> More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
> which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
> without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
> Solaris -P is added to the options since I don't use it myself. It's
> insert
More information: It looks like gcc driver invokes cc1 with -P option
which switches off linemakers on Solaris. On Linux cc1 is invoked
without -P and so linemakers are presented. The question is why on
Solaris -P is added to the options since I don't use it myself. It's
inserted by gcc itself...
