On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 23:20 -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>
>> > Perhaps we should add a comment to common.opt to explain this?
>>
>> Yes, we could apply this patch.
>
> Looks good to me (and I think it qualifies as obvious) :-).
I've committe
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 23:20 -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> > Perhaps we should add a comment to common.opt to explain this?
>
> Yes, we could apply this patch.
Looks good to me (and I think it qualifies as obvious) :-).
Thanks,
Ben
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Ben Elliston wrote:
>> > Is this an oversight, or are these options deprecated?
>>
>> These options are intentionally not documented: they should not be
>> used by programmers.
>
> Perhaps we should add a comment to common.opt to explain this?
Yes, we could apply
> > Is this an oversight, or are these options deprecated?
>
> These options are intentionally not documented: they should not be
> used by programmers.
Perhaps we should add a comment to common.opt to explain this?
Ben
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Ben Elliston wrote:
> Hi Sebastian
>
> While reading through the Graphite code on the trunk, I noticed that
> -fgraphite and -fgraphite-identity are no documented in doc/invoke.texi.
> Is this an oversight, or are these options deprecated?
These options are inten
