On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>
>
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:19 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>>>
Shall it be correct then to replace calls to error() and friends,
>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>>
>>>
>>> Shall it be correct then to replace calls to error() and friends,
>>> taking only format string with no-argument specifiers
>>> to error_
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>
>>
>> Shall it be correct then to replace calls to error() and friends,
>> taking only format string with no-argument specifiers
>> to error_at_no_args() ? (similarly we shall need warning_at_no_args,
>> pedwar
Prathamesh Kulkarni writes:
>
> Shall it be correct then to replace calls to error() and friends,
> taking only format string with no-argument specifiers
> to error_at_no_args() ? (similarly we shall need warning_at_no_args,
> pedwarn_no_args, etc.)
I would guess so, yes.
>>
>> Also, you'd need
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> "Joseph S. Myers" a écrit:
>
>> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately, I am not clear on how to check for format specifiers in
>>> string.
>>> Should I do it manually by checking the format string for specifi
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:32:34PM +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> "Joseph S. Myers" a écrit:
>
> > On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> >> Unfortunately, I am not clear on how to check for format specifiers in
> >> string.
> >> Should I do it manually by checking the format stri
"Joseph S. Myers" a écrit:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, I am not clear on how to check for format specifiers in
>> string.
>> Should I do it manually by checking the format string for specifiers
>> and call abort if found a no-argument specifier,
>> or is
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Unfortunately, I am not clear on how to check for format specifiers in string.
> Should I do it manually by checking the format string for specifiers
> and call abort if found a no-argument specifier,
> or is there a better way to do it ?
I'll lea
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> Souce of these warnings are typically calls to error() and friends.
>> In C and C++ front ends there are many calls of error (errmsg).
>> errmsg is in many cases, assigned the return va
On 01/21/2014 06:50 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Souce of these warnings are typically calls to error() and friends.
In C and C++ front ends there are many calls of error (errmsg).
errmsg is in many cases, assigned the return value of targetm hooks
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Souce of these warnings are typically calls to error() and friends.
> In C and C++ front ends there are many calls of error (errmsg).
> errmsg is in many cases, assigned the return value of targetm hooks
> (tagetm.invalid_return_type(), etc.) Is
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 09:09:25PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> --- gcc/c/c-convert.c (revision 206867)
> +++ gcc/c/c-convert.c (working copy)
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ convert (tree type, tree expr)
>if ((invalid_conv_diag
> = targetm.invalid_conversion (TREE_TYPE (expr), type)))
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
