Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures

2007-06-27 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Kenneth Zadeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The issue is not the io. The current organization, with each function > arranged in its own section is designed to so that that section can be > memory mapped in. The question how much work is it going to be to > transform what is mapped in into the w

Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures

2007-06-27 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:09:26AM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: > On 6/26/07 4:08 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: > > > But, first, I'd like to know what folks think about this. Would it be > > generally useful for us to have the IL data structures auto-generated > > this way? I can see the benefits in

Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures

2007-06-27 Thread Diego Novillo
On 6/26/07 4:08 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: > But, first, I'd like to know what folks think about this. Would it be > generally useful for us to have the IL data structures auto-generated > this way? I can see the benefits in the reader/writer. But also, we > are going to have to re-implement the

Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures

2007-06-27 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Kenneth Zadeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> In the lto world we will be reading in a function and then hacking on >> it. Many (most) of those hacks are not in place changes, but adding, >> deleting and rearranging instructions into the stream. >> >> Doing in pla

Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures

2007-06-26 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Kenneth Zadeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the lto world we will be reading in a function and then hacking on > it. Many (most) of those hacks are not in place changes, but adding, > deleting and rearranging instructions into the stream. > > Doing in place mapping puts severe restrictions

Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures

2007-06-26 Thread Kenneth Zadeck
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> But, first, I'd like to know what folks think about this. Would it be >> generally useful for us to have the IL data structures auto-generated >> this way? I can see the benefits in the reader/writer. But also, we >> a

Re: [tuples/LTO] RFC: houghts on auto-generating GS_* data structures

2007-06-26 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But, first, I'd like to know what folks think about this. Would it be > generally useful for us to have the IL data structures auto-generated > this way? I can see the benefits in the reader/writer. But also, we > are going to have to re-implement the