> Taras Glek; Gerald
> Pfeifer; Zbigniew Chamski; Cupertino Miranda
> Subject: Re: [plugins] Comparison of plugin mechanisms
>
> Hi Grigori and Zbigniew,
>
> I just took a look at the wiki page you guys put together. While I
> have some reservations about categorizing the plugin
Grigori Fursin wrote:
Dear all,
Zbigniew and I prepared a page on GCC Wiki comparing several current plugin
mechanisms (some parts should be updated) with some suggestions to move forward:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_PluginComparison
In case we mixed up or misunderstood something about other plu
.net]
>> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 8:38 AM
>> To: Grigori Fursin
>> Cc: 'Diego Novillo'; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; 'Sean Callanan'; 'Taras Glek';
>> 'Le-Chun Wu'; 'Gerald
>> Pfeifer'; 'Zbigniew Chamski'; 'Cupe
x27;; 'Le-Chun
> Wu'; 'Gerald
> Pfeifer'; 'Zbigniew Chamski'; 'Cupertino Miranda'
> Subject: Re: [plugins] Comparison of plugin mechanisms
>
> Hello All,
>
>
> Grigori Fursin wrote:
> > Basically, we currently see 3 com
Hello All,
Grigori Fursin wrote:
Basically, we currently see 3 complementary categories of GCC plugins, depending
on the nature of the extension: production, experimentation/research, and new pass
integration. Each category naturally calls for slightly different API features.
I am not sur
