Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| > libelf (0.8.5-35)
|
| This libelf is too old, see michael matz's message.
Which one is it?
-- Gaby
Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Should that read
| >
| >#include
|
| No, because on other systems it is directly in /usr/include:
| rpm -qf /usr/include/libelf.h
| elfutils-libelf-devel-0.119-1.2.1
| and there is no /usr/include/libelf/ directory.
| Guess GCC configure should
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My first attempt to compile the lto branch met with resistance:
>
> /home/gdr/redhat/lto.gcc/gcc/lto/lto-elf.c:27:20: error: libelf.h: No such
> file or directory
>
>
> libelf (0.8.5-35)
This libelf is too old, see michael matz's message.
You are going to
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:13:11PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> lto/lto-elf.c:27 currently says
>
>#include "libelf.h"
>
>
> Should that read
>
>#include
No, because on other systems it is directly in /usr/include:
rpm -qf /usr/include/libelf.h
elfutils-libelf-devel-0.119-1.2.1
an
