Re: [lto] Spurious failures in lto tests with -jN

2008-11-20 Thread Rafael Espindola
> Yes. AFAICT, it's intra .exp concurrency that's causing this. > Now that I think of it, maybe the problem is that file foo_0.c is going to one job and foo_1.c is going to another? > Diego. > Cheers, -- Rafael Avila de Espindola Google | Gordon House | Barrow Street | Dublin 4 | Ireland Reg

Re: [lto] Spurious failures in lto tests with -jN

2008-11-19 Thread Diego Novillo
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 17:51, Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I assume you mean when running make -jN check-gcc? Concurrency between > various .exp scripts should not cause you any problems, as each make > check is run in its own testsuite directory. Yes. AFAICT, it's intra .exp conc

Re: [lto] Spurious failures in lto tests with -jN

2008-11-19 Thread Ben Elliston
> I've noticed some spurious failures in the lto tests (g++.dg/lto and > gcc.dg/lto). They only occur with -jN. The symptom is an error > message from ld complaining that a .lto.ltrans.o file is missing. I > think this is a bug in the lto.exp script because the tests work fine > with -j1. I ass