Re: [google] Merged gcc-4_6-branch -> google/gcc-4_6

2011-06-30 Thread Diego Novillo
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:31, Ollie Wild wrote: > Diego will merge this to the google/gcc-4_6 branch. Done. Diego.

Re: [google] Merged gcc-4_6-branch -> google/gcc-4_6

2011-06-29 Thread Ollie Wild
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Ollie Wild wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > > > > The fix for 49094 had to be changed and is still being tested, even > > for trunk, and thus I have committed a 4.6 "backport" of the fix for > > PR 49516 on its own today (as rev

Re: [google] Merged gcc-4_6-branch -> google/gcc-4_6

2011-06-29 Thread Diego Novillo
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:24, Ollie Wild wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: >> >> The fix for 49094 had to be changed and is still being tested, even >> for trunk, and thus I have committed a 4.6 "backport" of the fix for >> PR 49516 on its own today (as revision 175

Re: [google] Merged gcc-4_6-branch -> google/gcc-4_6

2011-06-29 Thread Ollie Wild
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Martin Jambor wrote: > > The fix for 49094 had to be changed and is still being tested, even > for trunk, and thus I have committed a 4.6 "backport" of the fix for > PR 49516 on its own today (as revision 175634).  Nevertheles yes, the > patch is exactly the same,

Re: [google] Merged gcc-4_6-branch -> google/gcc-4_6

2011-06-29 Thread Diego Novillo
On 11-06-29 11:42 , Martin Jambor wrote: The fix for 49094 had to be changed and is still being tested, even for trunk, and thus I have committed a 4.6 "backport" of the fix for PR 49516 on its own today (as revision 175634). Nevertheles yes, the patch is exactly the same, only with a minor lin

Re: [google] Merged gcc-4_6-branch -> google/gcc-4_6

2011-06-29 Thread Martin Jambor
Hi, On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 05:06:34PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: > This merge brings google/gcc-4_6 up to date with the recently > released 4.6.1 (rev 175583). > > Since there was some interest in a few fixes in the upstream > branch, these are the revisions that made it through in this > merge