On 10/15/14 00:55, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 10/14/14 06:21, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Another similar issue I've seen is handling DW_TAG_lexical_block
(gen_lexical_block_die). Ideal
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
>> Another similar issue I've seen is handling DW_TAG_lexical_block
>> (gen_lexical_block_die). Ideally we should generate the
>> DW_TAG_lexical_block and the corresponding locals in early dumping, and
>> then fill in the high/low attribut
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 10/14/14 06:21, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>>
>>> Gentlemen, your feedback would be greatly appreciated!
>>>
>>> I was investigating why locals were not being early dumped, and re
Another similar issue I've seen is handling DW_TAG_lexical_block
(gen_lexical_block_die). Ideally we should generate the
DW_TAG_lexical_block and the corresponding locals in early dumping, and
then fill in the high/low attributes of the lexical block the second
time around. We would need a has
On 10/14/14 06:21, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Gentlemen, your feedback would be greatly appreciated!
I was investigating why locals were not being early dumped, and realized
Michael's patch was skipping decls_for_scope() unless
DECL_STRUCT_FUNC
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Gentlemen, your feedback would be greatly appreciated!
>
> I was investigating why locals were not being early dumped, and realized
> Michael's patch was skipping decls_for_scope() unless
> DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION->gimple_df was set. I assume
