On 3/6/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:05:06AM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
> I have used "strace -f" to check where linker looked for -lqt-mt. From
> what I have observed, it seems that ld didn't use
> $SYSROOT/etc/ld.so.conf.
Well, it's supposed to, so I s
On 3/6/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:05:06AM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
> I have used "strace -f" to check where linker looked for -lqt-mt. From
> what I have observed, it seems that ld didn't use
> $SYSROOT/etc/ld.so.conf.
Well, it's supposed to, so I s
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:05:06AM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
> I have used "strace -f" to check where linker looked for -lqt-mt. From
> what I have observed, it seems that ld didn't use
> $SYSROOT/etc/ld.so.conf.
Well, it's supposed to, so I suggest you check what's happened in ld.
--
Daniel Jacobo
First of all, my apology. It seems that I should have posted this
email to binutils's ML.
On 3/5/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:47:41PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
> Wouldn't it be great that we go one step further that we let ld look
> for libraries in the
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:47:41PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote:
> Wouldn't it be great that we go one step further that we let ld look
> for libraries in the dir listed in $SYSROOT/etc/ld.so.conf, if this
> file ever exits? Of course for each entry in $SYSROOT/etc/ld.so.conf,
> we prefix $SYSROOT to it.
