On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 11:54 +0100, Tejas Belagod wrote:
> >> What's interesting to me here is the bitpos - does this not need
> >> BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN correction? This seems to be inconsistenct with what
> >> happens
> >> with reduction operations in the autovectorizer where the scalar result in
>
What's interesting to me here is the bitpos - does this not need
BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN correction? This seems to be inconsistenct with what happens
with reduction operations in the autovectorizer where the scalar result in the
reduction epilogue gets extracted with a BIT_FIELD_REF but the bitpos ther
On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 11:47 +0100, Tejas Belagod wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for some help understanding how BIT_FIELD_REFs work with
> big-endian.
>
> Vector subscripts in this example:
>
> #define vector __attribute__((vector_size(sizeof(int)*4) ))
>
> typedef int vec vector;
>
> int foo(v
