Revital1 Eres/Haifa/IBM wrote on 14/11/2007 18:46:14:
>
> >
> > When scheduling insn 58, we calculate a window of possible cycles
according
> > to already scheduled predecessors and successors. This window looks
like a
> > parallelogram in general rather than a rectangle: in the first cycle
there
>
> When scheduling insn 58, we calculate a window of possible cycles
according
> to already scheduled predecessors and successors. This window looks like
a
> parallelogram in general rather than a rectangle: in the first cycle
there
> may be predecessors (already scheduled in the first cycle, or
Revital1 Eres/Haifa/IBM wrote on 13/11/2007 15:13:25:
> Hello,
>
> Following our off-line discussion; attached is the dump file of the
> problematic testcase. (sms-4.c)
>
> Here are some relevant details:
>
> insn 61(write) and 58(read) were swapped, so sms tries to generate some
> kind of reg-mov
