On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Which version has currently been picked, and where can such information
> reliably (thinking of a permanent weblink) be found?
If I were you, I'd use the latest 4.4 compiler. Not only is it the
RHEL6 system compiler, but because of some cr
Richard Biener dixit:
>in the install instructions (gcc/doc/install.texi) in the
>pre-requesites section.
Ah yes, I saw that, but…
>Currently it reads:
ⓐ that’s “curently”, plus it doesn’t specificially say
that 3.4 is the “stable” version currently picked,
which is one of the reasons I tho
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the GCC wiki says:
>
> “We will periodically pick a stable version of GCC, and require that that
> version of GCC be able to build all versions of GCC up to and including
> the next stable version. E.g., we may decide that all newer
Tobias Burnus net-b.de> writes:
> GCC since 4.8 requires a C++98 compiler, i.e. GCC since 3.4 should be
> fine. However, who knows when some C++11 features will start to get
Hrm, indeed.
> used. Thus, why not using the latest compiler which still builds with C,
> i.e. GCC 4.6 or GCC 4.7. (Th
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
“We will periodically pick a stable version of GCC, and require that that
version of GCC be able to build all versions of GCC up to and including
the next stable version. [...]
Which version has currently been picked, and where can such information
reliably (thinking of a p
