Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-26 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Alexander Verhaeghe wrote: > Quote Jan-Benedict Glaw "So please shut up now." > > Quite friendly I must say, it's the german way I > suppose of handling things? > > To Jan-Benedict Glaw I WON'T SHUT UP because of "Free > as in Freedom"! That's fine. Jus

ADMINISTRIVIA about Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
I thought I should point out that this thread has hit the "too many recipients" spam blocking rule at gcc.gnu.org so there are a number of messages from various people (but mostly from Alexander) which are not making it to the mailing list. cgf

Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 05:43:41PM -0700, Alexander Verhaeghe wrote: > Please tell me where I can read this "spat of > postings" so that I can evaluate them. I guess I have > to change emailaddress (not difficult) and name (more > difficult) after this stuff. I never typed so much in > a short time

Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Robert Dewar
Alexander Verhaeghe wrote: Always threatening, you're even worse than Microsoft... Once again "Free as in Freedom", how dare you to use this? Please don't forget to mention that you want to rip me off $300! First of all, again you are quoting my private messages. Second, the $300 has nothing t

Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Alexander Verhaeghe
Please tell me where I can read this "spat of postings" so that I can evaluate them. I guess I have to change emailaddress (not difficult) and name (more difficult) after this stuff. I never typed so much in a short time! --- Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 05:16:

Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Alexander Verhaeghe
"It is of course not a threat to point out that anything you post here will be permanently associated with your name for ever, and that there is no way to undo this. This is just a statement of fact." There is always a way of undoing things, it's simply a matter if you want to do so or not, and in

Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 05:16:37PM -0700, Alexander Verhaeghe wrote: > Always threatening, you're even worse than > Microsoft... > Once again "Free as in Freedom", how dare you to use > this? Please don't forget to mention that you want to > rip me off $300! > Alexander the email you requested re

Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Sun, 2006-06-25 17:02:41 -0700, Alexander Verhaeghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To Jan-Benedict Glaw I WON'T SHUT UP because of "Free > as in Freedom"! Ah, so your understanding of "Freedom" reads like: Okay guys, I've sent out some rude emails insulting you a bit about your fortran st

Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Alexander Verhaeghe wrote: >Quote Jan-Benedict Glaw "So please shut up now." > >Quite friendly I must say, it's the german way I suppose of handling >things? > >To Jan-Benedict Glaw I WON'T SHUT UP because of "Free as in Freedom"! However, you have been to

Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Alexander Verhaeghe
Always threatening, you're even worse than Microsoft... Once again "Free as in Freedom", how dare you to use this? Please don't forget to mention that you want to rip me off $300! --- Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Verhaeghe wrote: > > Quote Jan-Benedict Glaw "So please shut

Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Alexander Verhaeghe
Quote Jan-Benedict Glaw "So please shut up now." Quite friendly I must say, it's the german way I suppose of handling things? To Jan-Benedict Glaw I WON'T SHUT UP because of "Free as in Freedom"! --- Jan-Benedict Glaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-06-25 16:44:22 -0700, Alexander > V

Re: "Free as in Freedom"

2006-06-25 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Sun, 2006-06-25 16:44:22 -0700, Alexander Verhaeghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not only privacy is not respected, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > also threatened that more hits would be generated in > the archives, [EMAIL PROTECTED] shouldn't do that, > it's against privacy in case you didn't realize! T