Re: RM Q&A Session on May 27th

2010-05-19 Thread Mark Mitchell
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I note that many of the questions already added to that page could be seen > as suggesting a greater role for the RMs than there is at present in > setting directions for GCC development. RMs (in their RM capacity) do not > set priorities or make plans for GCC developm

Re: RM Q&A Session on May 27th

2010-05-19 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Mark Mitchell wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Release%20Manager%20Q%26A I note that many of the questions already added to that page could be seen as suggesting a greater role for the RMs than there is at present in setting directions for GCC development. RMs (in their

Re: RM Q&A Session on May 27th

2010-05-18 Thread Mark Mitchell
NightStrike wrote: >> If anyone would like to volunteer to set up a channel and/or moderate >> the chat itself, please let me know. > Can you just do it in #gcc on oftc? That's certainly the fallback possibility. Though, for those not interested, it would interrupt whatever else is being disc

Re: RM Q&A Session on May 27th

2010-05-18 Thread NightStrike
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Several people have asked that there be a forum for asking questions of > and providing feedback to the GCC RMs.  Since this is of course a very > widely distributed community, the best medium for this seems to be an > IRC chat.  To that end

RM Q&A Session on May 27th

2010-05-18 Thread Mark Mitchell
Several people have asked that there be a forum for asking questions of and providing feedback to the GCC RMs. Since this is of course a very widely distributed community, the best medium for this seems to be an IRC chat. To that end, I'll be hosting a 1-hour session on May 27th at 9:00 AM Pacifi