On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 23:06 +0200, Björn Haase wrote:
> Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > In
> > any case, you should assume that it is a much bigger job than just
> > modifying the call expander.
>
> Ok, I had a closer look at what is happening in present state gcc and I
> understand that it is indeed
Steven Bosscher wrote:
> In
> any case, you should assume that it is a much bigger job than just
> modifying the call expander.
Ok, I had a closer look at what is happening in present state gcc and I
understand that it is indeed a much more complex task than I first thought.
One Issue would be a
On Sunday 07 August 2005 14:07, Björn Haase wrote:
> I think that such kind of optimization could help very much for my
> fractional numerics library where some functions tend to be lengthy but use
> very few registers. I would be willing to try to implement it.
>
> I can imagine two possible appro
Steven Bosscher wrote on Sonntag, 7. August 2005 12:45 :
> On Sunday 07 August 2005 09:35, Björn Haase wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The avr port presently misses possible intra-procedure optimizations
> > concerning register use.
>
> What you describe is an _inter_procedural optimization. "Between
>
