Re: RFC: named address space support

2008-04-17 Thread Ben Elliston
Hi Joseph > > .. the embedded C proposal as of 2008-01-18 is at stage 90.92. This > > suggests that it's very close to being incorporated into the standard. > > Have I understood that correctly? > > No. All it means is that TR 18037 is being revised, not anything to do > with the standard. Th

Re: RFC: named address space support

2008-04-15 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Ben Elliston wrote: > Hi Mark > > > I'm not terribly familiar with this proposal. > > > Ben, to answer your original question, I don't think that lack of nested > > address spaces is a fatal flaw, as long as the implementation otherwise > > meets the spec, and as long as t

Re: RFC: named address space support

2008-04-14 Thread Ben Elliston
Hi Mark > I'm not terribly familiar with this proposal. > Ben, to answer your original question, I don't think that lack of nested > address spaces is a fatal flaw, as long as the implementation otherwise > meets the spec, and as long as the implementation doesn't somehow make > it harder to a

Re: RFC: named address space support

2008-04-09 Thread Ben Elliston
Hi Mark > I agree. Much to my dismay, the C and C++ committees don't seem to be > willing to work together to make sure that C remains a subset of C++. I'm afraid my patch doesn't address that. :-) > Ben, to answer your original question, I don't think that lack of nested > address spaces i

Re: RFC: named address space support

2008-04-09 Thread Mark Mitchell
Ben Elliston wrote: C++ is not supported because this proposal came from WG14 (which is not the C++ working group, WG21). There is no such proposal from the C++ folks. I don't know that implementing this right away in the C++ front-end is such a great idea. I agree. Much to my dismay, the C

Re: RFC: named address space support

2008-04-03 Thread Ben Elliston
> Is C++ supported? I do know for that fixed point types, C++ is mostly > supported (except mangling and a couple others). I think we should not > be adding extension unless they are both supported in the C and C++ > front-ends. C++ is not supported because this proposal came from WG14 (which is

Re: RFC: named address space support

2008-04-03 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Our implementation only covers section 5.1 of the proposal (named > address space support). Section 5.2 has not been implemented. Is C++ supported? I do know for that fixed point types, C++ is mostly supported (except ma

RFC: named address space support

2008-04-03 Thread Ben Elliston
The Embedded-C spec introduces a number of C language features useful for embedded development. GCC already implements fixed point arithmetic (Chapter 4) from this proposal. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1169.pdf Chapter 5 is divided into two sections: named address space su