> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 12:34:30 +0100
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I want it done there *only* because that's what it does for the
> similar but even more complex cc0 code and because combine does
> multi-insn simplifications in general.
Never mind, I think I have a reasonab
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:13:06 +0100 (CET)
> From: Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You really have to wonder if cleaning up this jump is a job combine
> should be doing.
I want it done there *only* because that's what it does for the
similar but even more complex cc0 code and because com
On Dec 20, 2005 10:50 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The actual code should be simple; I just want to check that
> there's consensus on the actual change before doing it.
>
> Thoughts?
You really have to wonder if cleaning up this jump is a job combine
should be doing. I woul
I'd like for combine to perform the following simplification:
(insn 14 13 16 0 /home/hp/combined/combined/gcc/config/cris/arit.c:228
(parallel [
(set (reg/v:SI 27 [ b.67 ])
(abs:SI (reg/v:SI 47 [ b ])))
(clobber (reg:CC 19 dccr))
]) 158 {abssi2} (in
