Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutes in libgcc2

2005-02-17 Thread Björn Haase
Am Donnerstag, 17. Februar 2005 03:11 schrieb James E Wilson: > James E Wilson wrote: > > Björn Haase wrote: > >> #ifndef TARGET_SPECIFIC_SUBSTITUE_FOR_MODE_DF > > I see now that this is PR 19920. This message would have made more > sense if you had included that important info. > > Anyways, I see

Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutes in libgcc2

2005-02-16 Thread James E Wilson
James E Wilson wrote: Björn Haase wrote: #ifndef TARGET_SPECIFIC_SUBSTITUE_FOR_MODE_DF I see now that this is PR 19920. This message would have made more sense if you had included that important info. Anyways, I see that Richard Henderson has added a reasonable fix for it now along the lines I

Re: RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutes in libgcc2

2005-02-16 Thread James E Wilson
Björn Haase wrote: #ifndef TARGET_SPECIFIC_SUBSTITUE_FOR_MODE_DF typedef float DFtype __attribute__ ((mode (DF))); #else typedef float DFtype __attribute__ ((mode (TARGET_SPECIFIC_SUBSTITUE_FOR_MODE_DF))); #endif These libgcc2 fu

RFC: Appropriate method for target-specific mode-substititutes in libgcc2

2005-02-14 Thread Björn Haase
Hi, I'd like to discuss with you a topic related to a recent bootstrap failure of a couple of smaller embedded targets. The origin of the failure could be removed easily. In my opinion the question is simply, what is the best way to implement it? Root of the problem is that libgcc2 presently d