> I think I understand what was being attempted now. IIUC, the logic
> should have been (again, for the QI/SI instance):
>
>If at least _26_ bits are set, and if c1 is < 64, ok to make the
> transformation.
Yes, that was the intended logic.
> In this case, I don't see an instance where "comp
Am I misinterpreting the logic? Am I missing something
fundamental? I appreciate any feedback / pointers / clues / etc...
Nothing like hitting the send button to make the lightbulb go on.
I think I understand what was being attempted now. IIUC, the logic
should have been (again, for the
I'm seeing invalid code produced for a simple test case targeting arm-
none-elf (attached), which I believe is caused by an invalid
transformation in simplify_comparison. It's transforming code of the
form:
(compare (subreg:QI (plus (reg:SI) (-1)))
(-3))
into:
(compare (plu
