On 12/01/16 17:10, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
What is the reason for these notes?
From https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-03/msg01316.html:
...
Using the reg-note we are able to easily link call_insns to their
corresponding declaration, even after the calls may have been split into
an ins
Hi!
What is the reason for these notes?
I mean, for indirect calls usually the argument is NULL, so at least for
that case I'd say
(expr_list:REG_CALL_DECL (nil)
is just a waste of RTL memory, because nothing will really make use of it:
static tree
get_call_fndecl (rtx_insn *insn)
{
rtx note, d
