On 5/14/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14 May 2007 12:40, Wei Chen wrote:
> help~~
> where is the statement?
At the line numbers Aaron mentioned of the latest rev of genautomata.c
> in whichi function?
gen_regexp_el
> i can't confirm them now!
Please see http://gcc.gnu.or
On 5/14/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 14 May 2007 12:40, Wei Chen wrote:
> help~~
> where is the statement?
At the line numbers Aaron mentioned of the latest rev of genautomata.c
> in whichi function?
gen_regexp_el
> i can't confirm them now!
Please see http://gcc.gnu.or
On 14 May 2007 12:40, Wei Chen wrote:
> help~~
> where is the statement?
At the line numbers Aaron mentioned of the latest rev of genautomata.c
> in whichi function?
gen_regexp_el
> i can't confirm them now!
Please see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00882.html
cheers
> Looks like you're right to me. We get away with it because a decl is larger
> than a regexp. Testing a patch now.
this would be fixed by my patch here
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00814.html
which is not reviewed yet. The patch switches to typesafe memory
allocation, which u
On 5/14/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12 May 2007 19:05, Aaron Gray wrote:
> I think I have found some bugs in genautomata.c
>
> regexp = create_node( sizeof( struct decl));
>
> I believe this should be :-
>
> regexp = create_node( sizeof( struct regexp));
>
> Lines :-
>
>
On 12 May 2007 19:05, Aaron Gray wrote:
> I think I have found some bugs in genautomata.c
>
> regexp = create_node( sizeof( struct decl));
>
> I believe this should be :-
>
> regexp = create_node( sizeof( struct regexp));
>
> Lines :-
>
> 1546
> 1551
>
> Compare with :-
>
>
